0 |
Subject: Umpire Information Needed
Posted by: Madman
- [44633210] Sun, Jul 23, 15:20
Two sets of questions.
First, does anyone know the algorithm / assignment procedure that MLB or someone uses to determine which umpiring crew goes to which ballpark for which series?
Secondly, does anyone have any knowledge concerning which umpires are known for liberal strike zones and which ones are known for tight ones?
Thanks for any and all input. |
1 | Strike One
ID: 496441210 Sun, Jul 23, 15:23
|
sorry, i don't know the answer to any of those questions but i think i like where it's going.
|
2 | allhair allstars
ID: 396452222 Sun, Jul 23, 15:29
|
I like where this line of thinking is going. The big/little strike zone is a little subjective perhaps, but I can see how this type of info could make or break a pitcher's performance/sway a trade into one pitcher or another.
This type of info might me a little too crazy for some, but baseball is a game of statistics, and I can't see how a little more data could hurt.
I can see it now, a new thread - Probable Umpires 7/23.
:)
|
3 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Sun, Jul 23, 15:32
|
I know the info is available somewhere for question #2. I have heard it asked before and someone had an answer. It may have been quite some time ago (even in a Guru feedback question and someone may have known before the message boards). Or maybe Mark L knew. He knows some sites with info.
#1 - sounds like a challenging one to look for. I wonder if MLB publishes it though. But I'll look around.
|
4 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Sun, Jul 23, 16:15
|
Madman - here is info for 1999. And thanks Mark L. Ended up there from a site I had bookmarked from you.
baseballstuff.com
Umpire ERA, BB/9, K/9 for 1999
Of course last year there were AL/NL umps. And 21 (?) are gone. But it may help.
|
5 | GoatLocker
ID: 226141512 Sun, Jul 23, 16:29
|
The only problem I see with this thread is that the pitcher matchup could have a lot to do with it.
What I'm saying, is that the question becomes how consistent the strike zone of that umpire is.
Is it the same for both pitchers.
If both pitchers are ACES, in my recollection, the strikezone is close to the same for both.
If one is an ace and the other is a rookie/bottom of the barrel pitcher, the strikezone seems to be narrower for the rookie/bottom of the barrel pitcher.
Just my opinion from what I've seen, and another thought to throw into the equation if you are going to check out this slant or angle.
Cliff
|
6 | Strike One
ID: 496441210 Sun, Jul 23, 16:32
|
what i think madman is getting to is not the pitching matchup vs umpire but umpire vs strike zone, for example your more likely to go with a pitcher that pitchers with a large strike zone ump as apposed to a small strikezone ump.
|
7 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Sun, Jul 23, 16:35
|
Law of averages over the course of a season 'should' (not will) average out what type of pitchers and ball parks umpires are behind the plate for.
I would imagine Pedro would do well with almost any ump. In fact the home plate ump today (Brian Onora) was next to last when it came to 'pitcher friendly' umps.
|
8 | GoatLocker
ID: 226141512 Sun, Jul 23, 16:38
|
I understand that, but what I'm probably not doing a good job of explaining is the following scenario.
Pedro pitches against F. Castillo against a (supposed) wide strike zone umpire.
Pedro might get the wide strike zone, and F. Castillo might be pitching to a much narrower strike zone.
In other words, even with a wide strike zone umpire, the reputation of the pitcher can also influence the width of the strike zone.
If you're only looking at using it for guys like RANDRO, it might be of value.
I jus tdon't know how much value it might be for other strike-out pitchers.
Cliff
|
9 | Strike One
ID: 496441210 Sun, Jul 23, 16:44
|
goatlocker has a good point, better pitchers get a wider strike zone...no matter who is the ump.
|
10 | Madman
ID: 146191423 Sun, Jul 23, 17:28
|
Steve h -- great site. I was already thinking of something more sophisticated -- calculating an adjusted ERA and adjusted BB/9IP for each umpire. The list that you have doesn't factor in the quality of the pitchers that an ump is judging.
It also find it interesting to see that Onora is listed as a hitter's ump. That sure wasn't the case today with both Sirotka and Pedro getting an extremely generous strike zone. It makes me somewhat doubt whether I'll come up with much.
I'm not sure how critical goatlocker's point is about good pitchers and bad pitchers being treated differently. I'll have to think about it some.
|
11 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 21:46
|
This table is subject to many criticisms, but here is the data for this year. What a pain in the $@#!@ to collect, too -- seriously.
I'm currently working on ways to control for the pitcher quality that each umpire has faced. Obviously, those umpires who've faced Randy and Pedro will have lower ERA's than those who haven't. But there are still some striking differences, especially in BB/9 IP.
This table is supported by recent anecdotal evidence I've been collecting, such as Angel Hernandez being a very fair, somewhat pitcher-friendly umpire (he was the umpire when Reichert threw his recent CG Shutout). Cousins had a tight strike zone in Ari. the other day, helping Guzman collapse, etc.
This data only pertains to statistics for starting pitchers, through 7/22. I've also not included many umpires who had less than 10 games (20 starts).
Sorry about the lack of color backgrounds, but it significantly increases the "heaviness" of the table, so unless people really want it, I'm going to quit doing it.
Name | Starts | IP | ER | BB | ERA | BB/9
|
---|
Rocky Roe | 20 | 119 | 49 | 57 | 3.71 | 4.31
| Doug Eddings | 42 | 272 2/3 | 114 | 82 | 3.76 | 2.71
| Brian Gorman | 44 | 261 2/3 | 112 | 94 | 3.85 | 3.23
| John Hirschbeck | 24 | 152 2/3 | 66 | 48 | 3.89 | 2.83
| Phil Cuzzi | 42 | 262 2/3 | 117 | 92 | 4.01 | 3.15
| Mark Wegner | 40 | 236 2/3 | 108 | 86 | 4.11 | 3.27
| Dale Scott | 38 | 237 2/3 | 113 | 77 | 4.28 | 2.92
| Ed Rapuano | 38 | 242 1/3 | 116 | 60 | 4.31 | 2.23
| Angel Hernandez | 42 | 254 | 123 | 75 | 4.36 | 2.66
| Greg Gibson | 38 | 236 2/3 | 115 | 91 | 4.37 | 3.46
| Jerry Layne | 38 | 225 2/3 | 110 | 82 | 4.39 | 3.27
| Ron Kulpa | 44 | 281 1/3 | 138 | 104 | 4.41 | 3.33
| Brian Runge | 40 | 247 | 122 | 97 | 4.45 | 3.53
| Charlie Williams | 30 | 180 | 89 | 81 | 4.45 | 4.05
| Tim Tschida | 42 | 251 2/3 | 125 | 92 | 4.47 | 3.29
| Charles Reliford | 44 | 256 1/3 | 128 | 104 | 4.49 | 3.65
| Marvin Hudson | 38 | 218 2/3 | 109 | 79 | 4.49 | 3.25
| Tony Randazzo | 42 | 241 2/3 | 121 | 85 | 4.51 | 3.17
| Terry Craft | 42 | 266 | 134 | 102 | 4.53 | 3.45
| Alfonzo Marquez | 40 | 243 1/3 | 123 | 119 | 4.55 | 4.40
| Mike Dimuro | 34 | 201 1/3 | 102 | 84 | 4.56 | 3.75
| Steve Rippley | 44 | 263 2/3 | 137 | 69 | 4.68 | 2.36
| Brian Onora | 40 | 239 | 125 | 80 | 4.71 | 3.01
| Chris Guccione | 20 | 129 2/3 | 68 | 61 | 4.72 | 4.23
| Jim Joyce | 28 | 166 | 87 | 73 | 4.72 | 3.96
| Mark Hirschbeck | 42 | 255 | 135 | 89 | 4.76 | 3.14
| John Shulock | 38 | 228 | 122 | 85 | 4.82 | 3.36
| Laz Diaz | 42 | 257 2/3 | 138 | 103 | 4.82 | 3.60
| Mike Reilly | 36 | 220 1/3 | 118 | 86 | 4.82 | 3.51
| Ted Barrett | 40 | 233 2/3 | 126 | 82 | 4.85 | 3.16
| Randy Marsh | 26 | 142 2/3 | 77 | 72 | 4.86 | 4.54
| Mike Fichter | 30 | 186 2/3 | 101 | 67 | 4.87 | 3.23
| Bill Miller | 38 | 220 2/3 | 120 | 69 | 4.89 | 2.81
| Jerry Meals | 38 | 227 2/3 | 124 | 111 | 4.90 | 4.39
| Tim McClelland | 42 | 243 1/3 | 134 | 112 | 4.96 | 4.14
| Greg Bonin | 20 | 125 | 69 | 50 | 4.97 | 3.60
| Jim McKean | 36 | 199 | 110 | 94 | 4.97 | 4.25
| Mike Winters | 40 | 238 | 132 | 90 | 4.99 | 3.40
| Eric Cooper | 40 | 237 1/3 | 132 | 110 | 5.01 | 4.17
| Al Clark | 42 | 251 | 140 | 98 | 5.02 | 3.51
| Rick Reed | 44 | 249 1/3 | 139 | 76 | 5.02 | 2.74
| Gerry Davis | 42 | 246 | 138 | 111 | 5.05 | 4.06
| Dan Morrison | 40 | 219 2/3 | 124 | 99 | 5.08 | 4.06
| Ed Montague | 40 | 228 2/3 | 129 | 89 | 5.08 | 3.50
| Cb Bucknor | 42 | 240 2/3 | 137 | 110 | 5.12 | 4.11
| Dana Demuth | 44 | 257 | 147 | 107 | 5.15 | 3.75
| Paul Schrieber | 36 | 205 1/3 | 118 | 83 | 5.17 | 3.64
| Larry Young | 40 | 234 1/3 | 135 | 98 | 5.18 | 3.76
| Jeffrey Kellogg | 40 | 222 1/3 | 129 | 95 | 5.22 | 3.85
| Jim Reynolds | 36 | 198 | 115 | 90 | 5.23 | 4.09
| Hunter Wendelstedt | 42 | 250 2/3 | 146 | 95 | 5.24 | 3.41
| Mike Everitt | 40 | 232 | 135 | 88 | 5.24 | 3.41
| Wally Bell | 44 | 256 | 149 | 107 | 5.24 | 3.76
| Derryl Cousins | 44 | 255 | 150 | 121 | 5.29 | 4.27
| Bill Welke | 38 | 229 | 135 | 86 | 5.31 | 3.38
| Travis Katzenmeier | 46 | 269 | 159 | 94 | 5.32 | 3.14
| Marty Foster | 42 | 251 2/3 | 150 | 104 | 5.36 | 3.72
| Mike Vanvleet | 40 | 237 2/3 | 142 | 127 | 5.38 | 4.81
| Mark Carlson | 42 | 257 | 157 | 99 | 5.50 | 3.47
| Scott Higgins | 24 | 140 1/3 | 86 | 63 | 5.52 | 4.04
| Rich Rieker | 46 | 261 | 162 | 134 | 5.59 | 4.62
| Tim Welke | 34 | 191 2/3 | 120 | 63 | 5.63 | 2.96
| Dan Iassogna | 44 | 255 2/3 | 162 | 103 | 5.70 | 3.63
| Fieldin Culbreth | 38 | 214 1/3 | 137 | 80 | 5.75 | 3.36
| Jeff Nelson | 38 | 211 1/3 | 136 | 98 | 5.79 | 4.17
| Paul Emmel | 42 | 237 | 155 | 97 | 5.89 | 3.68
| Tim Timmons | 38 | 219 2/3 | 145 | 102 | 5.94 | 4.18
| Chuck Meriwether | 40 | 218 2/3 | 147 | 95 | 6.05 | 3.91
| Kerwin Danley | 38 | 210 1/3 | 142 | 92 | 6.08 | 3.94
| Ian Lamplugh | 40 | 217 | 147 | 106 | 6.10 | 4.40
| Gary Cederstrom | 36 | 201 1/3 | 137 | 88 | 6.12 | 3.93
| Joe Brinkman | 20 | 107 | 74 | 49 | 6.22 | 4.12
| Jerry Crawford | 34 | 181 | 130 | 91 | 6.46 | 4.52
| Bruce Froemming | 42 | 227 | 165 | 117 | 6.54 | 4.64
|
|
12 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 21:55
|
Of course, this still doesn't help us a bunch unless we can figure out when someone like Rippley or Eddings is going to be behind the plate.
|
13 | allhair allstars
ID: 396452222 Sun, Jul 23, 22:10
|
Is there any way to get a history of the ump rotations? A monsterous job, but one option would be to go back and look at the game summaries and figure out who umped each game and where. Perhaps one could extrapolate a useable pattern. Actually, are we even sure that there is a set crew rotation? I know that a crew is assigned a series, but what happens if the crew just pulls straws to see who's behind the plate for games within that series? Hmmm... now that I think about it, I doubt that's the case.
Hey, is Hunter Wendelstedt Harry's kid?
|
14 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 22:24
|
allhair allstars I've been browsing around for info. on umpires. I found a link somewhere on the majorleaguebaseball.com's site that had umpire bio's -- you might be able to find that out, there.
I actually have all the data concerning who was behind the plate, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. for every game this season, but no pattern has jumped out. I've been looking at Rippley's crew (Tshida, Meriwether, Gibson), and he (Rippley) hasn't been behind the plate since 6/24! This is going to be hard.
Within one series, there is hope. In the 4-game set between Det and KC, each ump had one game at each position. Different crews seem to follow different rotation patterns, unfortunately. And sometimes, crews don't rotate at all for a day or two (although the home umpire is always different, I think). Aargh.
For a listing of the offical 2000 umpiring crews, check here Official 2000 Umpiring Crews and Chiefs.
|
15 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Sun, Jul 23, 22:26
|
There are 68 umps (listed at MLB). 60 needed on a full day. Not sure how they rotate who is off. Not even sure if it is 17 crews with two crews off at a time or 15 crews with a rotating relief of one person at a time. For instance, the crew that umped the Bosox-White Sox game today, I found 3 of the 4 as a group in a May game.
For a series or when they are together, they rotate left (counter base running each game). Guessing (did not look) that rotation continues as the crew moves on. If they relieve one person at a time in a crew for off time (in addition to days that 15 crews are not needed), I would imagine he takes the place of who he relieving in the rotation. Could find nothing on a published schedule.
|
16 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 22:55
|
Missing data items: For perfections' sake, I'm missing umpiring crew data from:
4/6 Fla v. SF
4/3 Fla v. SF
4/3 Mil v. Cin
As a side note, I had incorrectly attributed certain umpires to those games, so the above data will be slightly off for Ripley and a couple other umps.
steve houpt -- the counter base rotation cycle is especially good info. I was getting lost in the trees and didn't see the forrest. That rotation pattern does happen a lot. There are still a number of discrepancies that are hard to discern, but I'm willing to bank on that most of the time.
Do you have any idea how they choose WHERE a given crew is going to work next?
You know, we've made a ton of progress in just a few hours.
a) I think there is evidence to indicate a substantial effect that umpires may have on the pitcher,
b) We know the game to game rotation pattern on the diamond,
c) All that's left is to further peg down the size of the effect in a) and be able to predict the home ump in the first game of a new series!
|
17 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 22:57
|
PS -- Ripley just umped at home yesterday, and presided over a typical Coors' field game. I think he's back from vacation.
|
18 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 23:30
|
Here is a much more informative chart, sorted by the Umpire's last name. This analysis indicates that the effect of the umpire is on the order of a good pitcher's park effect, or about 1/2 of a Coor's field effect.
I'm pretty excited about this, since these totals seem to jive with some of the anecdotal evidence I've heard on the radio and seen on TV. Very interesting.
In the follwing table, I've listed data not only for the "umpire's stats", but also listed the averages (weighted by number of appearances) for the pitchers, and then compared the two.
Therefore, in large part, the quality of the pitchers that Angel Hernandez is facing is taken into account. He looks like a great pitchers umpire, but he's also had slightly better than league-average starters to umpire for. Therefore, you look at the difference; in his case, he's still a pitcher's umpire.
data to follow. (I'm hoping it will fit on a single post).
|
19 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 23:34
|
Data through 7/23:
Name | Starts | IP | ER | BB | ERA | BB/9 | SWP/G | Pitcher BB/9 | BB Diff | Pitcher SWP | SWPDiff
|
---|
Al Clark | 44 | 262 1/3 | 147 | 104 | 5.04 | 3.57 | 36.60 | 3.59 | -0.02 | 38.11 | -1.51
| Alfonzo Marquez | 42 | 255 2/3 | 131 | 121 | 4.61 | 4.26 | 39.30 | 3.66 | 0.60 | 40.62 | -1.32
| Angel Hernandez | 42 | 254 | 123 | 75 | 4.36 | 2.66 | 50.40 | 3.68 | -1.02 | 39.39 | 11.01
| Bill Miller | 38 | 220 2/3 | 120 | 69 | 4.89 | 2.81 | 38.60 | 3.52 | -0.71 | 33.85 | 4.75
| Bill Welke | 40 | 240 | 142 | 92 | 5.33 | 3.45 | 33.10 | 3.61 | -0.16 | 36.73 | -3.63
| Brian Gorman | 44 | 261 2/3 | 112 | 94 | 3.85 | 3.23 | 45.00 | 3.39 | -0.16 | 36.45 | 8.55
| Brian Onora | 42 | 256 | 125 | 82 | 4.39 | 2.88 | 52.10 | 3.91 | -1.03 | 36.87 | 15.23
| Brian Runge | 40 | 247 | 122 | 97 | 4.45 | 3.53 | 45.30 | 3.96 | -0.43 | 30.59 | 14.71
| Bruce Froemming | 42 | 227 | 165 | 117 | 6.54 | 4.64 | 16.10 | 3.67 | 0.97 | 34.99 | -18.89
| Cb Bucknor | 42 | 240 2/3 | 137 | 110 | 5.12 | 4.11 | 30.50 | 4.18 | -0.07 | 32.13 | -1.63
| Charles Reliford | 44 | 256 1/3 | 128 | 104 | 4.49 | 3.65 | 36.10 | 3.71 | -0.06 | 33.31 | 2.79
| Charlie Williams | 30 | 180 | 89 | 81 | 4.45 | 4.05 | 43.80 | 3.78 | 0.27 | 46.29 | -2.49
| Chris Guccione | 20 | 129 2/3 | 68 | 61 | 4.72 | 4.23 | 45.80 | 3.67 | 0.56 | 36.92 | 8.88
| Chuck Meriwether | 40 | 218 2/3 | 147 | 95 | 6.05 | 3.91 | 23.30 | 3.86 | 0.05 | 36.30 | -13.00
| Dale Scott | 38 | 237 2/3 | 113 | 77 | 4.28 | 2.92 | 52.20 | 3.30 | -0.38 | 40.21 | 11.99
| Dan Iassogna | 44 | 255 2/3 | 162 | 103 | 5.70 | 3.63 | 29.40 | 3.52 | 0.11 | 36.17 | -6.77
| Dan Morrison | 40 | 219 2/3 | 124 | 99 | 5.08 | 4.06 | 36.00 | 3.61 | 0.45 | 43.99 | -7.99
| Dana Demuth | 44 | 257 | 147 | 107 | 5.15 | 3.75 | 31.80 | 3.77 | -0.02 | 35.90 | -4.10
| Derryl Cousins | 44 | 255 | 150 | 121 | 5.29 | 4.27 | 31.10 | 3.72 | 0.55 | 38.62 | -7.52
| Doug Eddings | 44 | 286 2/3 | 118 | 86 | 3.70 | 2.70 | 65.20 | 3.61 | -0.91 | 42.09 | 23.11
| Ed Montague | 40 | 228 2/3 | 129 | 89 | 5.08 | 3.50 | 38.10 | 3.47 | 0.03 | 38.70 | -0.60
| Ed Rapuano | 40 | 256 2/3 | 117 | 65 | 4.10 | 2.28 | 57.40 | 3.43 | -1.15 | 43.09 | 14.31
| Eric Cooper | 40 | 237 1/3 | 132 | 110 | 5.01 | 4.17 | 39.10 | 3.65 | 0.52 | 41.20 | -2.10
| Fieldin Culbreth | 38 | 214 1/3 | 137 | 80 | 5.75 | 3.36 | 32.00 | 3.61 | -0.25 | 38.67 | -6.67
| Gary Cederstrom | 36 | 201 1/3 | 137 | 88 | 6.12 | 3.93 | 24.90 | 4.09 | -0.16 | 38.23 | -13.33
| Gerry Davis | 42 | 246 | 138 | 111 | 5.05 | 4.06 | 33.20 | 3.56 | 0.50 | 40.06 | -6.86
| Greg Bonin | 20 | 125 | 69 | 50 | 4.97 | 3.60 | 50.50 | 3.61 | -0.01 | 35.97 | 14.53
| Greg Gibson | 38 | 236 2/3 | 115 | 91 | 4.37 | 3.46 | 42.90 | 3.74 | -0.28 | 42.54 | 0.36
| Hunter Wendelstedt | 42 | 250 2/3 | 146 | 95 | 5.24 | 3.41 | 36.40 | 3.69 | -0.28 | 33.99 | 2.41
| Ian Lamplugh | 42 | 230 | 154 | 113 | 6.03 | 4.42 | 21.80 | 3.94 | 0.48 | 35.20 | -13.40
| Jeff Nelson | 38 | 211 1/3 | 136 | 98 | 5.79 | 4.17 | 25.80 | 4.15 | 0.02 | 32.14 | -6.34
| Jeffrey Kellogg | 40 | 222 1/3 | 129 | 95 | 5.22 | 3.85 | 33.00 | 3.57 | 0.28 | 41.55 | -8.55
| Jerry Crawford | 34 | 181 | 130 | 91 | 6.46 | 4.52 | 20.60 | 4.58 | -0.06 | 36.70 | -16.10
| Jerry Layne | 38 | 225 2/3 | 110 | 82 | 4.39 | 3.27 | 40.80 | 3.60 | -0.33 | 32.06 | 8.74
| Jerry Meals | 38 | 227 2/3 | 124 | 111 | 4.90 | 4.39 | 37.20 | 3.84 | 0.55 | 40.73 | -3.53
| Jim Joyce | 28 | 166 | 87 | 73 | 4.72 | 3.96 | 34.60 | 3.87 | 0.09 | 34.46 | 0.14
| Jim McKean | 36 | 199 | 110 | 94 | 4.97 | 4.25 | 28.90 | 3.95 | 0.30 | 30.71 | -1.81
| Jim Reynolds | 36 | 198 | 115 | 90 | 5.23 | 4.09 | 33.70 | 4.53 | -0.44 | 27.74 | 5.96
| Joe Brinkman | 20 | 107 | 74 | 49 | 6.22 | 4.12 | 14.50 | 3.62 | 0.50 | 32.80 | -18.30
| John Hirschbeck | 24 | 152 2/3 | 66 | 48 | 3.89 | 2.83 | 60.80 | 3.75 | -0.92 | 32.77 | 28.03
| John Shulock | 40 | 240 | 126 | 89 | 4.73 | 3.34 | 41.10 | 3.78 | -0.44 | 36.00 | 5.10
| Kerwin Danley | 38 | 210 1/3 | 142 | 92 | 6.08 | 3.94 | 21.30 | 4.41 | -0.47 | 26.12 | -4.82
| Larry Young | 40 | 234 1/3 | 135 | 98 | 5.18 | 3.76 | 35.10 | 3.60 | 0.16 | 34.88 | 0.22
| Laz Diaz | 42 | 257 2/3 | 138 | 103 | 4.82 | 3.60 | 44.30 | 3.49 | 0.11 | 36.65 | 7.65
| Mark Carlson | 42 | 257 | 157 | 99 | 5.50 | 3.47 | 37.30 | 3.65 | -0.18 | 40.76 | -3.46
| Mark Hirschbeck | 42 | 255 | 135 | 89 | 4.76 | 3.14 | 38.10 | 3.47 | -0.33 | 42.09 | -3.99
| Mark Wegner | 40 | 236 2/3 | 108 | 86 | 4.11 | 3.27 | 44.40 | 3.68 | -0.41 | 38.54 | 5.86
| Marty Foster | 42 | 251 2/3 | 150 | 104 | 5.36 | 3.72 | 28.50 | 3.70 | 0.02 | 35.85 | -7.35
| Marvin Hudson | 38 | 218 2/3 | 109 | 79 | 4.49 | 3.25 | 46.40 | 4.04 | -0.79 | 31.57 | 14.83
| Mike Dimuro | 34 | 201 1/3 | 102 | 84 | 4.56 | 3.75 | 37.60 | 3.93 | -0.18 | 38.55 | -0.95
| Mike Everitt | 40 | 232 | 135 | 88 | 5.24 | 3.41 | 35.60 | 3.45 | -0.04 | 37.82 | -2.22
| Mike Fichter | 32 | 200 1/3 | 106 | 71 | 4.76 | 3.19 | 46.90 | 3.41 | -0.22 | 43.09 | 3.81
| Mike Reilly | 38 | 228 2/3 | 132 | 89 | 5.20 | 3.50 | 34.90 | 3.84 | -0.34 | 35.82 | -0.92
| Mike Vanvleet | 42 | 248 2/3 | 150 | 134 | 5.43 | 4.85 | 26.00 | 3.51 | 1.34 | 40.41 | -14.41
| Mike Winters | 40 | 238 | 132 | 90 | 4.99 | 3.40 | 34.30 | 3.59 | -0.19 | 35.00 | -0.70
| Paul Emmel | 44 | 253 | 160 | 100 | 5.69 | 3.56 | 27.40 | 3.81 | -0.25 | 32.92 | -5.52
| Paul Schrieber | 36 | 205 1/3 | 118 | 83 | 5.17 | 3.64 | 33.60 | 3.81 | -0.17 | 39.31 | -5.71
| Phil Cuzzi | 44 | 278 2/3 | 121 | 95 | 3.91 | 3.07 | 49.20 | 3.47 | -0.40 | 37.10 | 12.10
| Randy Marsh | 26 | 142 2/3 | 77 | 72 | 4.86 | 4.54 | 33.50 | 4.15 | 0.39 | 39.27 | -5.77
| Rich Rieker | 46 | 261 | 162 | 134 | 5.59 | 4.62 | 28.20 | 3.75 | 0.87 | 33.86 | -5.66
| Rick Reed | 44 | 249 1/3 | 139 | 76 | 5.02 | 2.74 | 34.90 | 3.49 | -0.75 | 38.35 | -3.45
| Rocky Roe | 20 | 119 | 49 | 57 | 3.71 | 4.31 | 52.00 | 3.78 | 0.53 | 44.58 | 7.42
| Ron Kulpa | 42 | 267 1/3 | 133 | 97 | 4.48 | 3.27 | 44.30 | 3.68 | -0.41 | 37.14 | 7.16
| Scott Higgins | 26 | 154 1/3 | 89 | 68 | 5.19 | 3.97 | 37.50 | 3.90 | 0.07 | 35.16 | 2.34
| Steve Rippley | 40 | 241 2/3 | 126 | 63 | 4.69 | 2.35 | 40.40 | 3.50 | -1.15 | 43.19 | -2.79
| Ted Barrett | 40 | 233 2/3 | 126 | 82 | 4.85 | 3.16 | 37.10 | 3.29 | -0.13 | 38.51 | -1.41
| Terry Craft | 42 | 266 | 134 | 102 | 4.53 | 3.45 | 44.90 | 3.60 | -0.15 | 36.28 | 8.62
| Tim McClelland | 42 | 243 1/3 | 134 | 112 | 4.96 | 4.14 | 30.10 | 3.93 | 0.21 | 31.84 | -1.74
| Tim Timmons | 38 | 219 2/3 | 145 | 102 | 5.94 | 4.18 | 23.40 | 3.72 | 0.46 | 35.32 | -11.92
| Tim Tschida | 44 | 266 | 127 | 93 | 4.30 | 3.15 | 45.30 | 3.50 | -0.35 | 38.68 | 6.62
| Tim Welke | 34 | 191 2/3 | 120 | 63 | 5.63 | 2.96 | 30.40 | 3.59 | -0.63 | 32.92 | -2.52
| Tony Randazzo | 42 | 241 2/3 | 121 | 85 | 4.51 | 3.17 | 44.00 | 4.03 | -0.86 | 38.57 | 5.43
| Travis Katzenmeier | 46 | 269 | 159 | 94 | 5.32 | 3.14 | 37.20 | 3.72 | -0.58 | 30.90 | 6.30
| Wally Bell | 44 | 256 | 149 | 107 | 5.24 | 3.76 | 37.30 | 3.87 | -0.11 | 38.05 | -0.75
|
|
20 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Sun, Jul 23, 23:39
|
And, for the record, Mike Vanvleet has umped BOTH Randy and Pedro!
|
21 | Eat Acid
ID: 224241620 Sun, Jul 23, 23:39
|
Man, these posts are what make this board my favorite site on the web. The only input I can hope to offer on this one is that the rotation system does carry from series to series, barring vacations. Also I seem to remember a discussion on the radio last year that most of the umps take their three weeks a year somewhat sporadically. Their vacation schedule is probably not public knowledge.
Thanks Madman, I'm going to use this info and will help in its compilation in any way I can. Just point me to the maze.
|
22 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Sun, Jul 23, 23:41
|
madman - no idea on when or where (what city) they will work. Did searches at most baseball sites I can think of (how I ended up with 99 data - but nothing ever mentions a schedule). I wonder if it is even published. Best bet may be from first game of a series and then determine from there.
Only time I could really see it coming in handy in SW is if rotating or changing pitchers and then use it for that day/game. In a roto league where you start and sit different pitchers, it may be more help in a decision.
Definitely some interresting data. Weighting it by starters could be tough.
I see it IS 17 crews. The 4th umpire I found on Mark Herschbeck's crew was filling in for O'Nora. Name was Lamplugh. Not listed anywhere. And Iassogna on that crew is listed as on assignment as a replacement ump. Not listed at MLB. This could be harder than it's worth, but has been interresting. Heck, sometimes it's hard to keep up with the pitchers and they are published.
After reading the negotiations still going on, some of the 'resignees' may get job back. Some current umps may be 'retired', and a few others bought out. Who knows who will be umping.
Interresting story.
Status of 22 Umpires
|
23 | GoatLocker
ID: 226141512 Sun, Jul 23, 23:50
|
With Pedro and Randy out, I wonder what Mike VanVleets numbers look like.
Talk about a hitters ump.
Cliff
|
24 | Madman
ID: 44633210 Mon, Jul 24, 00:18
|
If those extra umps comeback, I guess I'll have to use the 99 data you linked above, steve houpt.
I guess you've found my secret motivation -- I'm losing serious ground in Echelon (just lost another start from Washburn, I see), and you rotate pitchers constantly in that game. Yes, this is of marginal value to a SW umpire unless trading for starts. But there are people playing a variety of games out there, and any game where you can bench/start your guys, this could be really helpful.
I wish I would have known Rapuano's reputation before today!
|
25 | steve houpt
ID: 5062656 Mon, Jul 24, 00:23
|
Glad to help - I'm sure there will be a day when it will come in handy in SW in helping make a close decision.
|
26 | mets
ID: 74452111 Mon, Jul 24, 00:29
|
damn steve you are the "source"!!! i definitely would vote for you for guru jr. again and Madman another guru jr,starting the thread and found out half the info on his own..amazing,of course these 2 are former guru jrs.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|