| 0 |
Subject: WWE Fantasy League - RULES
Posted by: mIST
- [3701817] Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 15:02
TV Show single win (pin): + 30 pts
TV Show tag win (pin): + 20 pts
TV Show single win (DQ - count out): + 10 pts
TV Show tag win (DQ - count out): + 5 pts
TV Show no contest: + 2 pts
TV Show single loss (pin): - 10 pts
TV Show tag loss (pin): - 5 pts
TV Show single loss (DQ - count out): - 5 pts
TV Show tag loss (DQ - count out): - 2 pts
TV Show interview: + 2 pts
TV Show backstage vignette: + 2 pts
TV Show in-ring promo: + 5 pts
TV Show run-in: + 5 pts
TV Show heel/face turn: + 15 pts (it must be CLEAR)
TV Show Tag Team Championship win: + 20 pts
TV Show Women Championship win: + 15 pts
TV Show Cruiserweight Championship win: + 15 pts
TV Show World/WWE Championship win: + 100 pts (it never happens, so it has to be a BIG bonus)
TV Show Main Event Slot: + 10 pts
PPV single win (pin): + 50 pts
PPV tag win (pin): + 35 pts
PPV single win (DQ - count out): + 20 pts
PPV tag win (DQ - count out): + 10 pts
PPV no contest: + 5 pts
PPV single loss (pin): - 20 pts
PPV tag loss (pin): - 10 pts
PPV single loss (DQ - count out): - 10 pts
PPV tag loss (DQ - count out): - 5 pts
PPV interview: + 5 pts
PPV backstage vignette: + 5 pts
PPV in-ring promo: + 10 pts
PPV run-in: + 10 pts
PPV heel/face turn: + 30 pts
PPV Tag Team Championship win: + 20 pts
PPV Women Championship win: + 15 pts
PPV Cruiserweight Championship win: + 15 pts
PPV World/WWE Championship win: + 50 PTS
PPV Main Event Slot: + 25 pts
Special rules for the Royal Rumble:
1st-10th Entry: + 15 pts
11th-20th Entry: + 10 pts
21st-30th Entry: +5 pts
1st-10th Elimination: - 10 pts
11th-20th Elimination: - 5 pts
21st-27th Elimination: 0 pts
28th Elimination: + 5 pts
29th Elimination: + 10 pts
Winner: + 50 pts
The match before the rumble is considered the main event.
Heat and Velocity don't give points to the wrestlers.
|
| 1 | Tree
ID: 599393013
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 15:29
|
holy crap.
|
| 2 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 15:34
|
I don't like the Royal Rumble appearance bonuses. Too random for me. Maybe the elimination points could all be made positive-----just for being included----and scale upward for lasting longer.
|
| 3 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 149272511
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 15:38
|
Agree with Mike D on the elimination points - otherwise, somebody not being picked ends up better off than somebody that was.
Cliff
|
| 4 | Farn
Donor
ID: 4710402716
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 15:43
|
how would being in the rumble hurt?
unless you enter 21st or later and get eliminated in the first 10 for example you can't lose points. You basically break even at worst just for entering the rumble.
|
| 5 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:19
|
Farn is right: you can't get negative points, so all in all I think it works fine.
I was also thinking to add a +2 bonus for every wrestler who eliminates someone else, what do you think?
|
| 6 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 149272511
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:25
|
If you get +5 points for being 21st to 30th entry and -10 points for being eliminated 1st to 10th, you would get -5 points, and the wrestler that didn't make the Rumble gets 0.
Unless I'm missing something.
Cliff
|
| 7 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:32
|
I "think" you are right, but I've referred the matter to PGunn.
|
| 8 | Farn
Donor
ID: 4710402716
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:35
|
if you enter 21st and get eliminated in the first 10 you should get negative points. Anybody that bad should be penalized.
|
| 9 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 149272511
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:43
|
Farn,
I agree, but not more than the guy that didn't get in period.
That is what my whole comment is about.
Somebody not making the Rumble gets 0 points.
Somebody in the Rumble should not get negative points.
Cliff
|
| 10 | Farn
Donor
ID: 4710402716
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:59
|
ok, how bout a -5 for anyone not in the rumble?
|
| 11 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 42109719
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 16:59
|
RE: 5-
I like that idea, but how do you keep track of something like that?
THK
|
| 12 | Tree
ID: 599393013
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 17:13
|
nah, don't like that. because then a main event guy NOT in the rumble loses points because he's in another match....
peace,
Tree
|
| 13 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 18:55
|
If he enters for 21st and goes out for 10th, then he deserves to lose points! :)
What about my "elimination points" idea?
|
| 14 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 19:24
|
Doesn't matter to me mIST either way.
|
| 15 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 42109719
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 20:26
|
mIST-
I like it, but how do you keep track of something like that?
THK
|
| 16 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 21:16
|
There are websites that track it THK........
|
| 17 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 22:30
|
BTW, it just occurred to me how weird it is that no one gets points for winning the intercontinental title, since it doesn't exist anymore. :o( i hate VKM.
peace,
Tree
|
| 18 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 42109719
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 23:20
|
What happened to the hardcore title? I don't remember the exact name, but Mankind/Bossman owned it most of the time. Each time it was up for grabs it was a NO HOLDS BARRED match that goes all over the place. That was the best!
THK
|
| 19 | Farn
Donor
ID: 4710402716
Fri, Jan 03, 2003, 23:21
|
i saw a Mankind/Bossman Hardcore title as the Main Event on Raw one night. Worst in person Main Event I ever saw.
|
| 20 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 07:35
|
The hardcore title was won by RVD against Tommy Dreamer some months ago, and included in the Intercontinental Title. Same thing as the European, won by RVD against Jeff Hardy. Then RVD lost against (if I remember right) Chris Jericho, who lost it against Kane.
Last, in a title vs title match, HHH unificated the World Championship with the Intercontinental.
I think that whole thing sucked, but it's just me.
Another thing: I thought it's not fair to actually have, let's say, PGunn get more points (zero) than someone who loses a match at a PPV.
What can we do?
|
| 21 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 07:39
|
man, mist picked HBK...are you a girl or something?!?!
;o)
Tree
|
| 22 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 07:44
|
He likes his superkick. ;)
|
| 23 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 07:50
|
man, i know you're a famous rock star and all, but don't you ever sleep!!??!
|
| 24 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 07:58
|
You and I own the same time zone. ;)
|
| 25 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:01
|
yea, but my girl is sick so i had to get up and walk the dog this morning...what's YOUR excuse?!?!
|
| 26 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:14
|
Bed at 12:30, up at 7:30 with my youngest of 3 (3 1/2).
|
| 27 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:15
|
Guess I'm not the only one up early.
What a surprising pick by Tree.
Good Pick Mike D.
Cliff
|
| 28 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:27
|
Thanks. Real happy getting Angle. He can do it all, literally. So at #5 I'm thrilled. I like Tree's pick, since Austin is supposed to be back anytime.
|
| 29 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:29
|
Angle was originally my number 2 guy, behind lesner...Batista and Steiner were also up there, so Austin eased into the spot...
|
| 32 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:33
|
Angle was #2 on my list.
Cliff
|
| 33 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:36
|
I had him 3.
|
| 35 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:39
|
Tree must be getting a cup of coffee....
|
| 36 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:39
|
Growing up in Iowa, leads me to being a big mark for the college / amatuer guys.
Cliff
|
| 37 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:40
|
I can understand that. The Lesnar/Angle matches that are coming soon should be incredible.
|
| 38 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:41
|
deal....
yea, i'm looking forward to lesner/angle...being a total wrestling geek, i remember being psyched watching lesner in ovw with benjamin...
|
| 39 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:43
|
Hopefully they'll get their act back together and do away with some of the BS.
They really have some talent and need to showcase it more.
Cliff
|
| 40 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:44
|
Speaking of the east coast, gotta go shovel some snow. Should be some good wrestlers available in the next round. Should be very interesting. Bye for now......
|
| 41 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:46
|
I'm on the west coast and it is still very early.
Catch you later Mike D
Cliff
|
| 42 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:47
|
wow, that's crazy early on the west coast...not even 6 yet?!?!?!
no snow here in nyc...:o) just lots of icky weather...
|
| 43 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 2601630
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:51
|
When I'm awake I get up.
Couldn't sleep and couldn't see lieing in bed.
Cliff
|
| 44 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:52
|
Man, it wasn't a hard pick, just look at who mainevented the last 2 PPVs :)
Anyway, I've always liked the REAL HBK, 96-97-98, while I really don't like the actual version. But you know what, he'll give me a lot of points :)
Another choice was my favourite guy, Chris Jericho, but he loses too much on important matches to be a #1 pick.
I hate seeing Angle on #5, he'll be the superstar of 2003, sure.
|
| 45 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 08:55
|
no, you're like my assistant at work. she loves HBK too...because he's cute... :o)
on sleep, i'm the same way. normally my gf walks the dog on the weekend and lets me sleep in, because she knows once i'm awake, i'm awake, even if i only had a few hours sleep...but, since she's ill, i took the reins, nice guy that i am.. :o)
|
| 46 | Mattinglyinthehall
ID: 1010341818
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 11:05
|
Seems to me we'd be best served to keep it simple as possible. I have no objection to the rules you guys have been toying with, but who's gonna keep score?
|
| 47 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 42109719
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 14:23
|
mIST- Just don't allow an inactive player to be started??!?? I don't know...that is kinda tough.
THK
|
| 48 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 16:20
|
It won't be hard to keep the score, there are just two shows per week and a PPV per month.
THK, what do you mean?
|
| 49 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 42109719
Sat, Jan 04, 2003, 16:25
|
Nevermind, I was under the impression we only start 5 wrestlers and have 3 bench spots. I meant if PGunn was drafted he must remain benched until he was due for a match. That way they couldn't start PGunn (an automatic 0) instead of somebody that will probably lose a match. But it isn't that way...
THK
|
| 50 | Tree
ID: 40115454
Sun, Jan 05, 2003, 12:15
|
i think we have 8 spots, and you can change week to week, but THREE must be on the bench, and you have to decide by noon on sunday...isn't that what we decided?
|
| 51 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Sun, Jan 05, 2003, 12:17
|
Personally, as I just said on the other thread, I think that 6-2 or 6-3 are better options.
|
| 52 | mIST
ID: 3701817
Sun, Jan 05, 2003, 17:28
|
Just added: 10 points for every WWE/World title defense and 5 points for every other title defense.
|
| 53 | blue hen
Leader
ID: 22100300
Sun, Jan 05, 2003, 17:32
|
Why not midnight Sunday Night? That way you can see Heat.
|
| 54 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 111103121
Sun, Jan 05, 2003, 17:34
|
Ok by me.
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|