0 |
Subject: New Official Scoring Rules
Posted by: Mattinglyinthehall
- [18027195] Fri, Feb 07, 2003, 19:23
ANY single win (pin): +30 ANY tag win (pin): +25 ANY single win (DQ - count out): +15 ANY tag win (DQ - count out): +10 ANY single loss (pin): +10 ANY tag loss (pin): +8 ANY single no contest: +10 ANY tag no contest +8 ANY single loss (DQ - count out): +8 ANY tag loss (DQ - count out): +6 ANY World/WWE Championship win: +50 ANY Tag Team Championship win: +25 ANY Cruiserweight Championship win: +15 ANY Women Championship win: +15 ANY WWE/World Title Defense: +10 ANY Other Title Defense: +5
TV Show interview: +2 TV Show backstage vignette: +2 TV Show in-ring vignette: +5 TV Show run-in/nterference: +5 TV Show heel/face turn: +10 (it must be CLEAR) TV Show Hosting: +2
PPV Match (in addition to win, loss or no contest points for the match) +12 PPV Main Event (in addition to win, loss or no contest points for the match) +20 PPV interview: +5 PPV backstage vignette: +5 PPV in-ring vignette: +10 PPV run-in / interference: +10 PPV heel/face turn: +15 PPV Hosting: +5 |
1 | Tree
ID: 22052618 Fri, Feb 07, 2003, 19:30
|
so, the guerreros are clearly faces, so thusly it was a clear face turn. :o)
|
2 | Mattinglyinthehall
ID: 18027195 Fri, Feb 07, 2003, 19:41
|
Unfortunately, there is an issue. I personally don't think it's a big deal. Hopefully the consensus will agree. Regrettably, when I put the proposals together, I missed the singles and tags DQ countout loss points, which I surely would have intended to include. The text under proposal #1 is pretty clear on it's intention. I don't think that anyone else caught that gaffe on my part because I have to assume that they would point out the obvious discrepency of positive points for a pin and negative points for a count out. I'm sure no one saw this and chose not to mention it because he thought he could exploit it. For those reasons and because I have to believe it would have passed if proposed anyway, I took the liberty of changing the scoring for singles and tag DQ's to +8 and +6, respectively, as would seem logicly approprite. If anyone takes issue with this, then for the sake of fairness please accept it as only a suggestion and I will delete this thread and repost the new scoring rules with the original penalties for those outcomes. But really, I'd hate to have to live with such a stupid and random scoring anomoly because of an honest oversight.
My apologies for this mistake.
|
3 | Mattinglyinthehall
ID: 18027195 Fri, Feb 07, 2003, 19:45
|
Also, I forgot to include TV Show Main Event +10.
I'll wait until everyone has seen post 2 and then make a new thread based on the league's response to that.
|
4 | blue hen Leader
ID: 331038201 Fri, Feb 07, 2003, 23:22
|
You shouldn't have said anything. No one would have noticed (or cared if they did)
|
5 | Tree
ID: 22052618 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 07:56
|
i'd like to make an addendum. it requires voting.
this 2 point thing for being seen backstage - i think it's getting out of hand.
if the camera pans and a guy is in the scene - NO POINTS - if a guy is an interactive part of the show, then they get the 2 points...
thoughts?
peace, Tree
|
6 | wiggs Donor
ID: 10261612 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 09:59
|
i agree with tree. I think they should have to impact the show in some way or another. I dont think they have to interview or fight someone, but if someone is talking, ie flair is talking with the other 3 around they should all get points. just my 2 cents.
|
7 | blue hen Leader
ID: 331038201 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 10:43
|
True.
|
8 | GoatLocker Sustainer
ID: 60151121 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 11:09
|
Agree with Tree.
Cliff
|
9 | Mike D Donor
ID: 31022116 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 11:34
|
Agree with Cliff.
|
10 | Tree
ID: 22052618 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 12:59
|
agree with mike d...and mca..and kind ad rock...
|
11 | Tree
ID: 22052618 Sat, Feb 08, 2003, 12:59
|
agree with mike d...and mca..and kind ad rock...
king ad rock even...
|
12 | blue hen Leader
ID: 40029714 Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 08:58
|
my butt
|
13 | Mike D Donor
ID: 38044119 Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 09:00
|
Agree with blue hen’s butt
|
14 | mIST
ID: 21113162 Mon, Mar 10, 2003, 03:53
|
What about getting ONE active guy on the bench? A kind of sixth man, I mean. He'd give you points if one of your five guys scores zero.
|
15 | blue hen Leader
ID: 40029714 Mon, Mar 10, 2003, 09:21
|
Nah. That's too defeating of the purpose of the bench.
|
16 | mIST
ID: 5351150 Tue, Apr 15, 2003, 06:01
|
Up
|
17 | blue hen Leader
ID: 22100300 Wed, Apr 16, 2003, 01:18
|
How about making major parts of backstage skits worth five points?
If a guy's just sitting watching the match on a TV, that's two, but if he confronts Eric Bischoff and has a 5 minute conversation backstage that should be 5.
|
18 | mIST
ID: 5351150 Wed, Apr 16, 2003, 02:49
|
I think it can turn into a mess... :)
|
19 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Wed, Apr 16, 2003, 08:05
|
Agreed, good idea in theory but there'll always be varied opinions of what needs to take place for 3 extra points, regardless of how the rule is worded.
|
20 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Wed, Jul 09, 2003, 13:21
|
BUTT
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|