| 0 |
Subject: Top 50 Superstars of All Time
Posted by: Farn
- Leader [451044109] Sat, Nov 13, 2010, 00:02
Shawn Michaels was named the number one Superstar in World Wrestling Entertainment's forthcoming DVD set counting down the top 50 Superstars of all time, WWE: Top 50 Superstars of All Time.
The DVD's complete 1 to 50 ranking is as follows:
1. Shawn Michaels
2. The Undertaker
3. Steve Austin
4. Bret Hart
5. The Rock
6. Harley Race
7. Ricky Steamboat
8. Andre the Giant
9. Rey Mysterio
10. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper
11. Eddie Guerrero
12. Triple H
13. Gorgeous George
14. "Macho Man" Randy Savage
15. "Mr. Perfect" Curt Hennig
16. John Cena
17. Dusty Rhodes and Ric Flair (tied)
19. Edge
20. Jerry "The King" Lawler
21. Lou Thesz
22. Terry Funk
23. Hulk Hogan
24. Bruno Sammartino
25. Chris Jericho
26. Ted DiBiase
27. Fabulous Moolah
28. Classy Freddie Blassie
29. Randy Orton
30. Pat Patterson
31. The Iron Sheik
32. Jimmy Snuka
33. Mick Foley
34. Kurt Angle
35. Buddy Rogers
36. Gorilla Monsoon
37. Junkyard Dog
38. "Superstar" Billy Graham
39. Jake "The Snake" Roberts
40. Big Show
41. Jack Brisco
42. Sgt. Slaughter
43. Kane
44. Nick Bockwinkel
45. Jeff Hardy
46. Dory Funk Jr.
47. Bob Backlund
48. Rick Rude
49. Batista
50. Killer Kowalski |
| 1 | Farn
Leader
ID: 451044109
Sat, Nov 13, 2010, 00:04
|
I'm not sure what the criteria for this was.
1. Wrestling ability? If so, Cena at 16 and Flair at 17?
2. Entertainer? If so, Hogan at 23?
Is Vince really setting the list like this because some of those guys are with TNA? I know why Benoit isn't on there. And I think they are prevented from listing Owen if they had wanted to. But I'm really lost as to how this list go put together.
|
| 2 | Greg Rude
ID: 2151181
Sat, Nov 13, 2010, 02:23
|
... and a tie? Really? I don't care what the format, it's still a highly opinionated ranking ... so a tie, at #17? They really couldn't lean one way or the other on that?
|
| 3 | Great One
ID: 53105119
Sat, Nov 13, 2010, 09:28
|
Flair not in the top 5 of any of these lists is just ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message:
|