RotoGuru Politics Forum

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread


0 Subject: Wikileaks - the dump

Posted by: Seattle Zen
- [10732616] Wed, Dec 01, 2010, 19:33

Are these really State Secrets?

Surprised there hasn't been mention of this yet, perhaps because it really isn't that big of a deal. We learned very little.

Right now Julian Assange has a red notice from Interpol for alleged sex crimes in Sweden.

If there was ever a person and a time when any allegation against him immediately screams - "SET UP!", it would be him and now.
Only the 50 most recent replies are currently shown. Click on this text to display hidden posts as well.
35Perm Dude
      ID: 5510572522
      Fri, Dec 10, 2010, 20:49
Via the Daily What, the most damning WikiLeaks cable yet.
36Boldwin
      ID: 591147257
      Sat, Dec 25, 2010, 08:52
Science Fiction [Brunner] was sorting thru the morality of this in 1975.
“Is this an unforgivable invasion of privacy?” Haflinger asks the assembled media. “Invasion of privacy it is; unforgivable … Well, do you believe that justice shall not only be done but shall be seen to be done? The privacy my worm is designed to invade is that privacy under whose cover justice is not done and injustice is not seen.”
I haven't sorted this myself but it's powerful stuff. What does it mean when governments can't say or do anything in private? How does that reshape the world?
37sarge33rd
      ID: 280311620
      Tue, Dec 28, 2010, 18:32
Govts do a LOT, which has yet to be revealed. God willing, it never will be.
38Boldwin
      ID: 35615181
      Fri, Oct 07, 2011, 09:10
Tangling with the unscrupulous is seriously risky business.

Hacking into Anonymous has it's blowback.
39Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 13:57
Add a new name to the list of hero whistle blowers - Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance revelations
Three weeks ago, Snowden made final preparations that resulted in last week's series of blockbuster news stories. At the NSA office in Hawaii where he was working, he copied the last set of documents he intended to disclose.

He then advised his NSA supervisor that he needed to be away from work for "a couple of weeks" in order to receive treatment for epilepsy, a condition he learned he suffers from after a series of seizures last year.

As he packed his bags, he told his girlfriend that he had to be away for a few weeks, though he said he was vague about the reason. "That is not an uncommon occurrence for someone who has spent the last decade working in the intelligence world."

On May 20, he boarded a flight to Hong Kong, where he has remained ever since. He chose the city because "they have a spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent", and because he believed that it was one of the few places in the world that both could and would resist the dictates of the US government.

In the three weeks since he arrived, he has been ensconced in a hotel room. "I've left the room maybe a total of three times during my entire stay," he said. It is a plush hotel and, what with eating meals in his room too, he has run up big bills.

He is deeply worried about being spied on. He lines the door of his hotel room with pillows to prevent eavesdropping. He puts a large red hood over his head and laptop when entering his passwords to prevent any hidden cameras from detecting them.

Though that may sound like paranoia to some, Snowden has good reason for such fears. He worked in the US intelligence world for almost a decade. He knows that the biggest and most secretive surveillance organisation in America, the NSA, along with the most powerful government on the planet, is looking for him.

I wonder if he had consensual sex with anyone in Sweden?
40Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 14:05
Ah, yes, the fallout - US in damage control mode after Edward Snowden's explosive NSA leaks
In London, the British foreign secretary, William Hague, was forced to defend the UK's use of intelligence gathered by the US. Other European leaders also voiced concern.

The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is expected to grill Obama next week, during a much-awaited summit in Berlin. Peter Schaar, Germany's federal data protection commissioner, told the Guardian it was unacceptable for the US authorities to have access to EU citizens' data, and that the level of protection is lower than that guaranteed to US citizens.
41Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 14:13
It'll be interesting how the GOP frames this. After all, they wasted no effort in painting such people as traitors during the Bush Administration.

My own take is that they simply cannot resist trying to hurt Obama.
42Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 14:28
And just so I'm clear: I hope they do. Run with Snowden, and shut down the pro-war GOP members who have been running the GOP's Foreign Policy desk for 20 years now.

And maybe this will even give courage to weak-kneed Democrats to do the right thing and shut this dammed thing down. Repeal the Patriot Act.
43Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 14:43
And maybe this will even give courage to weak-kneed Democrats to do the right thing and shut this dammed thing down. Repeal the Patriot Act.


I've been thinking along those lines, too. This is a great "reach across the aisle" opportunity.
44bibA
      ID: 54522612
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 15:06
It'll be interesting how the GOP frames this.

Bet my bottom dollar they will portray Snowden as a hero....you know, like they did with Assange and Ellsberg.

Seeing the likes of Dianne Feinstein defend the NSA wiretapping does make me shake my head. Wouldn't she probably have been all over Bush for the same thing?
45Boldwin
      ID: 31541109
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 16:37
This is a great opportunity to see who work for the people and who work for the power elite.

I watch Lindsey Graham and my blood just boils.

I've been thinking along those lines, too. This is a great "reach across the aisle" opportunity.

Bet my bottom dollar they will portray Snowden as a hero....you know, like they did with Assange and Ellsberg.

Ellsberg was giving aid and comfort to an enemy in wartime. I was very conflicted on Assange at first but came around 95% in support of him. I'm still thinking there were a few things released that didn't do the greater good. I'd help bail him out tho.

There's a Chinese recruiter working on Snowden with a strong arm. I wouldn't be surprised if he turns them down and he ends up shipped back home. I got a world of respect for that dude. Show me what harm he did?

46sarge33rd
      ID: 4609710
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 16:53
(A) How is this "whistle-blowing", when USA Today covered this very thing in their May 11, 2006 edition?

(B) Why all this phoney outrage, when it has been public knowledge for 7 years?

(C) When will Americans develop an attention span in excess of 30 seconds and a news cycle in excess of 10?

5/11/2006 USA Today on NSA and Verizon et al
47Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 17:23
a decent response by Andrew Sullivan, This is bullsh...
48Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 17:32
A majority of Americans – 56% – say the National Security Agency’s (NSA) program tracking the telephone records of millions of Americans is an acceptable way for the government to investigate terrorism, though a substantial minority – 41% – say it is unacceptable. And while the public is more evenly divided over the government’s monitoring of email and other online activities to prevent possible terrorism, these views are largely unchanged since 2002, shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Currently 62% say it is more important for the federal government to investigate possible terrorist threats, even if that intrudes on personal privacy. Just 34% say it is more important for the government not to intrude on personal privacy, even if that limits its ability to investigate possible terrorist threats.

Why will nothing change, read above.
49Boldwin
      ID: 25111019
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 20:14
The problem as I see it is that the issue is NOT the 'somewhat' limited sort of general metadata they claim they track. The problem is that they have the keys to all the doors. There isn't anything they can't access and there isn't any way you could trust them to limit themselves.

But they will skate because they will claim the limited generalized data is useful. Which is a debatable position.

They will skate because we are in the post-Clinton era in which relentless shamelessness is invincible. Your backers will eventually wave the moveon.org flag longer than the media will stick to their putative mission. If you have absolutely no shame.
50Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 20:33
What people need to remember, especially those on the Right with little memory of actual events, is that the NSA actions are entirely legal. Under laws pushed through by the GOP, over the protests of leftist activists that they pilloried and called "naive."
51Boldwin
      ID: 25111019
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 20:49
Conservatives were sounding the alarm just as loudly as Rachel Maddow. Both sides need to sound the alarm and not stop sounding it until the threat has been subdued, culprits have been fired, jailed and thrown out of office.
52Boldwin
      ID: 25111019
      Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 21:09
Sacrifices were made. Big ones.

Freedom is not free.
53Boldwin
      ID: 25111019
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 00:07
The administration claims authority to sift through details of our private lives because the Patriot Act says that it can. I disagree. I authored the Patriot Act, and this is an abuse of that law. [...]

...Technically, the administration’s actions were lawful insofar as they were done pursuant to an order from the Fisa court. But based on the scope of the released order, both the administration and the Fisa court are relying on an unbounded interpretation of the act that Congress never intended.

Congress intended to allow the intelligence communities to access targeted information for specific investigations. How can every call that every American makes or receives be relevant to a specific investigation?

This is well beyond what the Patriot Act allows.
When the author of the Patriot Act says 'this abuse must end' it's pretty obvious no one should allow partisan calculations, patriotism, inertia, inattention or fear to allow this business to continue.
54Boldwin
      ID: 8514113
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 04:37
Re:SZ#48

I'm out of time atm, but check the Rassmussen poll. If I remember correctly their results flip flop the ones you quote. Perhaps the way you word this one makes a big diff.
55Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 11:38
Final Rasmussen poll: Romney 49 - Obama 48

Yeah, SZ--check them out. They appear to be the opposite of what you have cited. For some reason.
56boikin
      ID: 430211013
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 12:09
I think there is big point that people are missing in this issue is that the data is not being deleted. Yeah fine they only chased terrorist but nothing is stopping them from going back through past data at there leisure looking for whatever they please. While combing through every call seems impossible today, 5 years from now when it is not you think the they are going to let there huge warehouses of data go untouched.
57Boldwin
      ID: 365471111
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 12:56
Remember back when Poindexter was building the 'Total Information Awareness' program and they supposedly shut it down?

They never stop.

Remember that humongous warehouse for all the world's electronic data storage they just built in Utah?



Do you think it has even occurred to them that they might stop and make the slightest correction in direction?
58Frick
      ID: 432501512
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 13:34
From what I've seen, they are requesting (and probably saving) the metadata from calls (to/from/length), but not the actual call itself. And it is within possibility that they are data mining that amount of information currently. I doubt that is more data then Google has and what they are analyzing.

Boikin, is your fear that the government will go back through the data and start trying to charge people with crimes based on the telephone usage patterns?
59Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 13:57
I'm sure the metadata is being saved, but certainly it is less useful as time goes on, particularly without content.
60boikin
      ID: 430211013
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 14:10
I doubt they convict anyone based on the data they are collecting but they could probably decide to ruin your day with the data. Also the data does not lose its value with time it actually gains value as it ages. when data first comes in is raw and is mostly analyzed using basic techniques but as data ages they will be able to connect it with more future data which will increasing power of the analysis. Secondly they have multiple types of data sources which google, yahoo, apple,... don't have independently the combination of meta data of multiples sources could lead who knows what kind of patterns.
61sarge33rd
      ID: 4609710
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 14:36
re 53...what was the persons opinion, when on May 11, 2006, USA Today said NSA was collecting data from Verizon, AT&T, Mobile, Sprint, etc etc?
62Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 14:37
Yes, the data is more useful once analyzed, and that takes a bit of time. That wasn't my point.

Say you have some data that has been analyzed. Is your point that the data is more useful in ten years? Fifteen?
63Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 14:38
they could probably decide to ruin your day with the data

As could Facebook. Or your credit card company, or bank...

Is that the standard we are going for here? I don't mean to be flip, but all this is old news, frankly.
64boikin
      ID: 430211013
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 16:20
I agree for the most part, I would say the main difference is that a) I willing agree to use those services and b) i sign a legal contract with them so I do at least to some extent have legal/civil recourse.
65Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 18:24
They did not build those huge buildings to store meta data, meta data does not take up much space itself. They store EVERYTHING, the audio of the phone calls, the text of email. They admit to only viewing the meta data without a warrant, but if you become a suspect, they can get a warrant and go back and listen to every call, read every email. That was one of the new pieces of information that was contained in Snowden's leak.

So, PD, I think Sullivan is slightly off point. The feds are currently claiming to only study the meta data, but they have ALL of the data and will use it when they deem appropriate.
66Boldwin
      ID: 365471111
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 21:01
67Boldwin
      ID: 365471111
      Tue, Jun 11, 2013, 21:03
They don't just have every bit of data, it appears practically any agent, even a retired one can access it for giggles.
68Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 11:46
#65: That may be true. I genuinely don't know (and, really, none of us do). There is vast, vast, vast amounts of metadata, and analyzing just the metadata takes a lot of room as well.

And, as has been said elsewhere, the whole thing might, indeed, be a gross violation of power (I don't think we know enough to say so yet, but it has both the appearance and the opportunity to be such). None of it is illegal, however, and Snowden isn't a "whistleblower" in that sense. He's not pointing out criminal behavior so much as pointing out government actions with which he disagrees.
69Boldwin
      ID: 125451212
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 13:45


This really belongs in the 'War On Free Speech' thread but the mods here won't allow a thread on that scandal.
70Boldwin
      ID: 125451212
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 13:49
None of it is illegal, however, and Snowden isn't a "whistleblower" in that sense.

Considering that the author of the Patriot Act says it is being interpreted in a way they never dreamed the courts would countinence, he's still a whistleblower in the classic sense of the term. Who else was going to reveal it? The stakes are nothing less than the survival of America as we know it, and he faced the highest possible risk in doing this patriotic service for us all.
71Tree
      ID: 275221211
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 14:15
<>Considering that the author of the Patriot Act says it is being interpreted in a way they never dreamed...

then the author of the patriot act was, and is, a moron.

those of us who were against it then predicted this sort of thing with more accuracy than nearly anything you've predicted on these boards.
72Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 14:24
Reminds me of the southern state rep who was shocked! shocked! to find that her bill to help religious schools would also be used by Muslim religious schools.
73sarge33rd
      ID: 4609710
      Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 19:52
Who else was going to reveal it?

USA Today, on May 11, 2006.
74Boldwin
      ID: 535391222
      Thu, Jun 13, 2013, 00:01
March 2013 – Hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee (Oxymoron) Senator Wyden: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper: “No, sir.” James Clapper knowingly LIED to Congress because he never thought his lie would be revealed by Edward [...]

I guess he wasn't worried about USA Today either.
75Seattle Zen
      ID: 3603123
      Sat, Jun 15, 2013, 22:58
Yep, the NSA can listen to your domestic phone calls without a warrant, well, that's what they are doing, whether it is legal or not...

NSA admits listening to U.S. phone calls without warrants
The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."
76Boldwin
      ID: 14538161
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 06:02
HONG KONG GETS IT- FREE SNOWDEN, ARREST OBAMA



This, in a peculiar colony of Red China.
“By standing up for Snowden, I also want to send a message that we need that kind of citizen in Hong Kong,” activist Chikwan Ho told ABC News. “Somebody who is watching our government to see if they are abusing power to control our lives.”
Also sending a message to their Beijing overlords who I would imagine are considerably less interested in public opinion than Obama is. Unless it damages the West and makes them look better in comparison if you don't think about it too carefully.
77Boldwin
      ID: 14538161
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 06:03
Source
78Boldwin
      ID: 14538161
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 06:10
The Scorecard: Snowden Approval Rating 54%, Obama 46%, Congress 17%
79Perm Dude
      ID: 201027169
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 12:44
#75: It will be *very* interesting to see Obama's reaction to all this. This is a defining moment for this Administration, and the fact that the GOP will hate him no matter what he does should take them out of the equation.

Time to do the right thing.
80Frick
      ID: 157331422
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 14:08
I agree with PD. No matter what Obama's response is, the Republican party will complain and point out what he is doing wrong.

But, for the rest of the country, this could very well set the tone for his legacy.
81biliruben
      ID: 41431323
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 14:46
The NSA Director walks into a bar.
Bartender: I’ve got a new joke for you.
NSA Director: Heard it.

http://www.samefacts.com/2013/06/uncategorized/prism-in-action/
82Boldwin
      ID: 50591616
      Sun, Jun 16, 2013, 22:46
And in 25 years after the great civil war, after American Holocaust is over, a brave new president will unplug the database, vow NEVER AGAIN
— MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) May 13, 2013 - Drudge on Twitter
The_man_has_a_lotta_sources.
83Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Thu, Aug 29, 2013, 17:41
Hat tip to Eric Snowden...

Intelligence-collecting colossus eats $56.4 billion dollars a year.
The 178-page budget summary for the National Intelligence Program details the successes, failures and objectives of the 16 spy agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community, which has 107,035 employees. “The United States has made a considerable investment in the Intelligence Community since the terror attacks of 9/11, a time which includes wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Arab Spring, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction technology, and asymmetric threats in such areas as cyber-warfare,” Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. said in response to inquiries from The Post. Among the notable revelations in the budget summary:

•Spending by the CIA has surged past that of every other spy agency, with $14.7 billion in requested funding for 2013. The figure vastly exceeds outside estimates and is nearly 50 percent above that of the National Security Agency, which conducts eavesdropping operations and has long been considered the behemoth of the community.

•The CIA and NSA have launched aggressive new efforts to hack into foreign computer networks to steal information or sabotage enemy systems, embracing what the budget refers to as “offensive cyber operations.”

•The NSA planned to investigate at least 4,000 possible insider threats in 2013, cases in which the agency suspected sensitive information may have been compromised by one of its own. The budget documents show that the U.S. intelligence community worried long before Snowden’s leaks about “anomalous behavior” by personnel with access to highly classified material.

•U.S. intelligence officials take an active interest in foes as well as friends. Pakistan is described in detail as an “intractable target,” and counterintelligence operations “are strategically focused against [the] priority targets of China, Russia, Iran, Cuba and Israel.”
84Seattle Zen
      ID: 3310162612
      Mon, Sep 30, 2013, 18:19
The impact of a leaked terrorist plot by Al Qaeda in August has caused more immediate damage to American counterterrorism efforts than the thousands of classified documents disclosed by Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor.
Since news reports in early August revealed that the United States intercepted messages between Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as the head of Al Qaeda, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of the Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, discussing an imminent terrorist attack, analysts have detected a sharp drop in the terrorists’ use of a major communications channel that the authorities were monitoring. Since August, senior American officials have been scrambling to find new ways to surveil the electronic messages and conversations of Al Qaeda’s leaders and operatives.

“The switches weren’t turned off, but there has been a real decrease in quality” of communications, said one United States official, who like others quoted spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence programs.

The drop in message traffic after the communication intercepts contrasts with what analysts describe as a far more muted impact on counterterrorism efforts from the disclosures by Mr. Snowden of the broad capabilities of N.S.A. surveillance programs. Instead of terrorists moving away from electronic communications after those disclosures, analysts have detected terrorists mainly talking about the information that Mr. Snowden has disclosed.
 If you believe a recent post violates the policy on Civility and Respect,
you may report the abuse via email to moderators@rotoguru1.com 
RotoGuru Politics Forum

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread




Post a reply to this message: Wikileaks - the dump

Name:
Email:
Message:
Click here to create and insert a link
Click here to insert a block of hidden (spoiler) text
Ignore line feeds? no (typical)   yes (for HTML table input)


Viewing statistics for this thread
Period# Views# Users
Last hour11
Last 24 hours11
Last 7 days44
Last 30 days1411
Since Mar 1, 200740561600