|
| Posted by: Farn
- Sustainer [451044109] Mon, Dec 08, 2003, 23:11
Jim Ross 2
Jerry Lawler 2
Jericho 5+12+2= 19
Christian= 5+12+2= 19
Lita 5+5+12= 22
Trish 5+5+12= 22
D-Von 25+10= 35
Buh Buh 25+10= 35
Batista 2+30+2+5= 39
Orton 2+2+5= 9
Flair 2+5+2+5+5= 19
Bischoff 2+2+2= 6
Rob Van Dam 15+5= 20
Cade 5+25= 30
Jindrak 5+25= 30
Val Venis 12
Lance Storm 12
Kane 2+10= 12
Mick Foley 5
Renee Dupree 5
Sylvain Grenier 5
Rock 5
Coach 2
Booker T 12
Rosey 12
Hurricane 12
Scott Steiner 25
Test 25
Mark Henry 25+2+5= 32
Teddy Long 2
Victoria 25
Molly Holly 25
Matt Hardy 5
Goldberg 18
HBK 5 |
| | | 1 | Farn
Sustainer
ID: 451044109
Mon, Dec 08, 2003, 23:12
|
I believe I caught everything. If you spot something just post the change.
Take the day off Mist. Thanks for doing it every other week though.
|
|
| | | 2 | Species
Leader
ID: 7724916
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 00:06
|
That should be Rob Conway with 5 points......Sylvain Grenier is hurt.
|
|
| | | 3 | mIST
ID: 5351150
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 04:36
|
Thanks man!
I was just about to write them down :)
|
|
| | | 4 | Farn
Sustainer
ID: 451044109
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 07:06
|
ah, good catch Species. I saw La Restistance come out and immediately found something else to do. Lost focus until Rock came out. :)
|
|
| | | 5 | wiggs
Donor
ID: 211116514
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:30
|
should the lumberjacks get 10 points for main event points? They were technically involved in the match.
|
|
| | | 6 | wiggs
Donor
ID: 211116514
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:31
|
actually no main event points were handed out.
|
|
| | | 7 | Farn
Sustainer
ID: 451044109
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:34
|
damn, i forgot those.
+10 for Goldberg and Kane
I didn't give Main Event points to the Lumberjacks because they weren't wrestling the match. They were more like officials. But I think I gave them interferance points.
|
|
| | | 9 | Mattinglyinthehall
Sustainer
ID: 1629107
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:38
|
OK, I deleted that post because I forgot it was a DQ. Sorry. But if I'm not mistaken, the title was on the line.
|
|
| | | 10 | wiggs
Donor
ID: 211116514
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:41
|
yes, the title was on the line.
|
|
| | | 11 | Mattinglyinthehall
Sustainer
ID: 1629107
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:42
|
A quick check to Rajah and PWScoops confirms that the ME was in fact non-title.
|
|
| | | 12 | Mattinglyinthehall
Sustainer
ID: 1629107
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:42
|
from PWScoops:
Non Title Match
Lumberjack Match
Referee:
Kane vs. Goldberg (c)
|
|
| | | 14 | wiggs
Donor
ID: 211116514
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:44
|
dam, i could have sworn they said "goldberg will defend his title against Kane."
|
|
| | | 15 | Mattinglyinthehall
Sustainer
ID: 1629107
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:46
|
For some reason I was sure it was for the title as well, Wiggs. I even commented to my gf that I wouldn't be surprised to see Kane win it and hold the belt for a week, since it wouldn't have any impact on the Armegeddon match.
|
|
| | | 16 | Mike D
Sustainer
ID: 41831612
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 11:35
|
Rajah doesn't comment either way (title/non-title). I wasn't watching it.
|
|
| | | 17 | Species
Leader
ID: 569221717
Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 12:40
|
During the match, I recall JR and The King commenting about what a huge momentum-swing it would be for Kane to get the victory over Goldberg as they prepare for the PPV. No mention of the title being on the line.
|
|
|
|