0 |
Subject: Week 14 Raw Points
Posted by: Farn
- Sustainer [451044109] Mon, Dec 08, 2003, 23:11
Jim Ross 2 Jerry Lawler 2 Jericho 5+12+2= 19 Christian= 5+12+2= 19 Lita 5+5+12= 22 Trish 5+5+12= 22 D-Von 25+10= 35 Buh Buh 25+10= 35 Batista 2+30+2+5= 39 Orton 2+2+5= 9 Flair 2+5+2+5+5= 19 Bischoff 2+2+2= 6 Rob Van Dam 15+5= 20 Cade 5+25= 30 Jindrak 5+25= 30 Val Venis 12 Lance Storm 12 Kane 2+10= 12 Mick Foley 5 Renee Dupree 5 Sylvain Grenier 5 Rock 5 Coach 2 Booker T 12 Rosey 12 Hurricane 12 Scott Steiner 25 Test 25 Mark Henry 25+2+5= 32 Teddy Long 2 Victoria 25 Molly Holly 25 Matt Hardy 5 Goldberg 18 HBK 5 |
1 | Farn Sustainer
ID: 451044109 Mon, Dec 08, 2003, 23:12
|
I believe I caught everything. If you spot something just post the change.
Take the day off Mist. Thanks for doing it every other week though.
|
2 | Species Leader
ID: 7724916 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 00:06
|
That should be Rob Conway with 5 points......Sylvain Grenier is hurt.
|
3 | mIST
ID: 5351150 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 04:36
|
Thanks man! I was just about to write them down :)
|
4 | Farn Sustainer
ID: 451044109 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 07:06
|
ah, good catch Species. I saw La Restistance come out and immediately found something else to do. Lost focus until Rock came out. :)
|
5 | wiggs Donor
ID: 211116514 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:30
|
should the lumberjacks get 10 points for main event points? They were technically involved in the match.
|
6 | wiggs Donor
ID: 211116514 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:31
|
actually no main event points were handed out.
|
7 | Farn Sustainer
ID: 451044109 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:34
|
damn, i forgot those.
+10 for Goldberg and Kane
I didn't give Main Event points to the Lumberjacks because they weren't wrestling the match. They were more like officials. But I think I gave them interferance points.
|
9 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:38
|
OK, I deleted that post because I forgot it was a DQ. Sorry. But if I'm not mistaken, the title was on the line.
|
10 | wiggs Donor
ID: 211116514 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:41
|
yes, the title was on the line.
|
11 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:42
|
A quick check to Rajah and PWScoops confirms that the ME was in fact non-title.
|
12 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:42
|
from PWScoops: Non Title Match Lumberjack Match Referee: Kane vs. Goldberg (c)
|
14 | wiggs Donor
ID: 211116514 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:44
|
dam, i could have sworn they said "goldberg will defend his title against Kane."
|
15 | Mattinglyinthehall Sustainer
ID: 1629107 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 10:46
|
For some reason I was sure it was for the title as well, Wiggs. I even commented to my gf that I wouldn't be surprised to see Kane win it and hold the belt for a week, since it wouldn't have any impact on the Armegeddon match.
|
16 | Mike D Sustainer
ID: 41831612 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 11:35
|
Rajah doesn't comment either way (title/non-title). I wasn't watching it.
|
17 | Species Leader
ID: 569221717 Tue, Dec 09, 2003, 12:40
|
During the match, I recall JR and The King commenting about what a huge momentum-swing it would be for Kane to get the victory over Goldberg as they prepare for the PPV. No mention of the title being on the line.
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|